The idea of progress is really a sexy one, a linear narrative we've informed ourselves for centuries, a tale of ascent from the black caves of superstition to the gleaming spires of reason, from the challenging struggle for emergency to the curated comfort of contemporary life, a trip noted by the regular deposition of understanding, the taming of organic forces, and the ever-expanding group of individual empathy and rights, a course that, despite its periodic stumbles and detours, undoubtedly details upward toward a better, more prosperous, and more enlightened potential for all humanity, but what if this history, for several its relaxing clarity, is fundamentally problematic, a great impression stitched from the threads of particular memory and technological triumphalism that obscures a more technical,
more uncertain, and perhaps even more uncomfortable fact, a fact where our best improvements are inextricably connected to new kinds of peril, our options provide delivery to novel problems, and our liberation from ancient burdens imposes a unique, subtler kinds of confinement, forcing us to confront the disturbing likelihood that development isn't a direct line but a control, or maybe even a severe dance, wherever every advance can be, in certain crucial and usually unanticipated way, a step sideways or even backward in to a couple of issues we lacked the creativity to foresee? Consider the enormous start of the Agricultural Innovation, that foundational change which allowed our hunter-gatherer ancestors to be in, to construct villages that would become areas and then towns, to store surplus food which allowed specialization, giving increase to the artist, the scribe, the priest,
and the master, thereby putting the foundation for all following civilization, artwork, research, and culture as we all know it, an unequivocal step of progress in the human saga, and however this very move, as thinkers from Rousseau to contemporary anthropologists have stated, also planted the seeds of cultural stratification, of entrenched inequality where for the very first time some guys could accumulate wealth and energy around the others, it led to the thought of personal house and with it, land disputes and wars of a level unimaginable to nomadic artists, it condensed populations in to unsanitary 오피스타 that became breeding reasons for crisis conditions like smallpox and measles, diseases that jumped from the domesticated animals we today existed in shut vicinity to, and it often resulted in a less different and nutritious diet, resulting in medical issues like dental corrosion and
iron-deficiency anemia that have been less frequent among foraging peoples, therefore we should ask, was that progress a pure great, or was it a devil's deal, a trade wherever we obtained the possibility of culture and complexity at the expense of introducing endemic inequality, widespread struggle, and novel types of putting up with? The same paradoxical structure repeats with dizzying consistency for the duration of record, take the Industrial Revolution, that good motor of transformation which started in the wet coal-fields of England and spread across the globe, unleashing prodigious effective energy, creating unprecedented wealth, filling the entire world with marvels of design and ease, from railways that shrank continents to electrical gentle that banished the night, from mass-produced things that raised the standard of living for millions to medical improvements that begun to conquer age-old