looking backward and drawing a range through the points we have chosen as victories, while conveniently ignoring the data factors that represent loss, collateral damage, or new vulnerabilities, it is the story of medical research triumphing over smallpox although not the history of the antibiotic opposition now producing within our overuse of those really medicines, it's the story of the Green Innovation feeding billions although not the story of the topsoil degradation and loss in agricultural biodiversity that supported it, it is the history of the automobile allowing particular freedom and mobility but not the history of the suburban sprawl, the sedentary lifestyles, and the geopolitical issues over fat that it engendered, and in each situation, the progress is true and important, but it is never free, it is definitely a purchase, and the bill usually comes due years later, in a currency the first innovators could not have conceived of. This is not to disagree for a negative or reactionary
position, to not suggest that individuals should reject technology and engineering and retreat with a idealized pastoral past that never truly existed, for that would be to ignore the very true advantages that development has bestowed—the alleviation of pain through anesthesia, the ability to talk with a loved one across an sea, the near-eradication of particular diseases, the rational joy of understanding the cosmos—but alternatively to supporter for a older, more nuanced, and eventually more responsible comprehension of what development means, one that acknowledges their inherently dialectical character, their tendency to produce a new synthesis which has both the thesis of its benefit and the antithesis of its charge, a understanding that development is less about reaching one last state of perfection and more about moving a constant number of trade-offs, of handling
the consequences of our own power and ingenuity. This calls for a change inside our considering from the mindset of conquest to one of stewardship, from viewing the world as a challenge to be solved through pure force of intellect to viewing 오피스타 as a sophisticated, interconnected process of which we are part and with which we should find a dynamic and sustainable equilibrium, it means that each advancement, from a fresh social networking platform to a fresh genetic design strategy, should be examined not only for the quick application and profit potential however for its long-term, second-order effects on the psychological, social, and ecological systems it will inevitably alter, it demands that people cultivate a new virtue for the modern era: the virtue of foresight, the humble recognition of our own fallibility, and the ethical courage to occasionally forego a certain type of power or comfort
in the title of keeping something more delicate and eventually more valuable, be it individual dignity, democratic integrity, or planetary health. The real way of measuring our progress in the 21st century, thus, may possibly not be found in the rate of our microprocessors or the achieve of our communities, but in our combined knowledge, inside our power to appear clearly at the double-edged blade of our personal achievements and to use it with a profound feeling of duty, recognizing that the absolute most substantial growth we can produce is always to evolve our own mind to fit our technological prowess, to produce the moral and intellectual structure essential to control the